JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Taxi driver gets 7 years for rape, buggery of teen

by

Derek Achong
4 days ago
20250328

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

A taxi dri­ver from San Juan has been sen­tenced to sev­en years in prison af­ter be­ing con­vict­ed of rap­ing a 14-year-old girl over a decade ago.

Nigel Tou­s­saint was con­vict­ed of two charges of hav­ing sex with a mi­nor and bug­gery at the end of his judge-alone tri­al be­fore Jus­tice Kathy-Ann Wa­ter­man-Latchoo, last Mon­day, and was sen­tenced on Tues­day.

Tou­s­saint was ac­cused of at­tack­ing the teen on two oc­ca­sions dur­ing the Car­ni­val sea­son in Feb­ru­ary 2012.

The first in­ci­dent oc­curred af­ter the girl left steel­pan prac­tice and sought a taxi to take her home.

Tou­s­saint, who was 23 years old at the time, re­port­ed­ly picked up the girl and her friend, who were both dressed in their school uni­forms.

Af­ter drop­ping her friend off, Tou­s­saint, who knew the vic­tim from be­fore as he is the un­cle of one of her oth­er friends, drove to a des­o­late area where he raped and bug­gered her.

He then dropped her off by her street cor­ner af­ter she promised not to tell her moth­er what tran­spired.

Sev­er­al weeks lat­er, he picked up the girl at the taxi stand af­ter she left school. He took her to his house in San Juan where he had sex with her be­fore drop­ping her home.

She even­tu­al­ly told her moth­er, who took her to the po­lice sta­tion to make a re­port.

Tou­s­saint was charged af­ter she was med­ical­ly ex­am­ined.

Tou­s­saint did not tes­ti­fy in his de­fence but brought his moth­er as a wit­ness.

While his moth­er ini­tial­ly claimed that he was with her at the time the girl claimed that she was at­tacked, she (the moth­er) ad­mit­ted that she could not pro­vide him with an al­i­bi when she was cross-ex­am­ined by pros­e­cu­tor Dy­lan Mar­tin.

Jus­tice Wa­ter­man-Latchoo sen­tenced him to sev­en years in prison for each of the sex­u­al of­fences.

She or­dered that the sen­tences be served con­cur­rent­ly mean­ing that he would be re­leased af­ter serv­ing sev­en years.

He re­ceived the sev­en-year sen­tence for bug­gery as at the time he was con­vict­ed the Court of Ap­peal had not ruled on the con­sti­tu­tion­al­i­ty of seg­ments of the Sex­u­al Of­fences Act per­tain­ing to bug­gery and se­ri­ous in­de­cen­cy.

De­liv­er­ing a judg­ment on Tues­day af­ter­noon, three judges of the Court of Ap­peal ruled that the seg­ments were un­con­sti­tu­tion­al as they sub­sti­tut­ed the pro­vi­sions of the Of­fences Against the Per­son Act 1925, which first in­tro­duced the of­fences.

In so do­ing, they re­duced the 25-year max­i­mum sen­tence for bug­gery un­der the Sex­u­al Of­fences Act to the five-year sen­tence in the colo­nial-age leg­is­la­tion.

As part of his sen­tence, Jus­tice Wa­ter­man-Latchoo or­dered him to reg­is­ter as a sex of­fend­er with­in a week of his even­tu­al re­lease.

He was al­so or­dered to re­port to the po­lice every three months for five years up­on his re­lease.

The Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice was or­dered to pub­lish his name and de­tails of his con­vic­tion on the Pub­lic Sex Of­fend­er Web­site with­in 14 days.

The Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by Niara Boodan.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored