The Chaguaramas Development Authority (CDA) intends to defend the eviction of the Chaguaramas Military History and Aerospace Museum (CMHAM) in court.
This follows a judge granting an injunction allowing its operators to return to the premises after they were locked out by the CDA on Carnival Monday morning.
In a statement yesterday, the CDA said it “is confident that when the full facts are placed before the court, the CDA’s legal position will be fully vindicated.”
Among those supporting the museum’s case are CMHAM president Linda Kelshall, vice president Brian Mitchell, and deputy political leader of the National Transformation Alliance Lorraine Pouchet, representing Gary Griffith.
The Chaguaramas Military History and Aerospace Museum said it has been trying to secure a lease from the CDA for 30 years.
However, the CDA said yesterday, “This is a temporary order issued without any notice to the Chaguaramas Development Authority (CDA) and without the Court hearing the CDA. It does not determine the legal position of the CDA or of the Chaguaramas Military History and Aerospace Museum.”
It added, “The CDA continues to discharge its statutory obligations in accordance with law and with a view to ensuring that proper revenue is obtained from the public lands within its remit.”
Responding to the CDA statement yesterday, vice president of the museum Mitchell said, “I read the statement, and in the PR world, that is called damage control. They are aware of it as well as we are that the matter will be coming up in court on Monday, and from there, there will be a decision, hopefully.”
Mitchell said the museum had full confidence in the judicial system to hear this matter.
Along with volunteers, members of the museum spent yesterday combing through its historical pieces to see if anything was damaged or missing.
In a letter dated October 1, 2024, the CDA withdrew its 30-year lease, which Kelshall said places the museum and its more than 500 years of history in jeopardy.
The CDA said it made several attempts to regularise the museum as a lessee, but in the last four years, it did not receive a substantive response from the proprietors, who continued to operate on the land without paying rent.