JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Three businesspeople win lawsuits over FUL applications

by

76 days ago
20250117
Police Commissioner Erla Harewood-Christopher

Police Commissioner Erla Harewood-Christopher

Derek Achong

Se­nior Re­porter

derek.achong@guardian.co.tt

Two busi­ness­men and a busi­ness­woman have won their law­suits over de­lays in de­cid­ing their long-out­stand­ing firearm user’s li­cence (FUL) ap­pli­ca­tions.

High Court Judges Devin­dra Ram­per­sad, Ricky Rahim, and Ava­son Quin­lan-Williams re­cent­ly up­held the sep­a­rate cas­es brought by the en­tre­pre­neurs, whose iden­ti­ties were with­held due to po­ten­tial se­cu­ri­ty con­cerns raised by their lawyers.

All three ap­plied for FULs, were grant­ed pro­vi­sion­al FULs, suc­cess­ful­ly un­der­went firearm com­pe­ten­cy train­ing, and sub­mit­ted their cer­tifi­cates to the Firearms Per­mit Unit.

One of the busi­ness­men from Ch­agua­nas first ap­plied over a decade ago, while the oth­er busi­ness­man from Pe­nal and the busi­ness­woman from Cara­pichaima ap­plied in mid-2021.

While their lawyers all ad­mit­ted that there was no dead­line for de­cid­ing a FUL ap­pli­ca­tion un­der the Firearms Act, they sug­gest­ed that it should be done with­in a rea­son­able time.

The judges all agreed, as they is­sued a se­ries of de­c­la­ra­tions over the de­lays and gave dead­lines for Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er Er­la Hare­wood-Christo­pher to de­cide their ap­pli­ca­tions.

They al­so or­dered the Of­fice of the Po­lice Com­mis­sion­er to pay the le­gal costs in­curred by the trio in pur­su­ing their cas­es.

Their suc­cess in the lit­i­ga­tion does not mean that they would now au­to­mat­i­cal­ly re­ceive the FULs, as Hare­wood-Christo­pher may still ex­er­cise her dis­cre­tion to re­ject their ap­pli­ca­tions.

Since be­ing ap­point­ed to the post in 2023, Hare­wood-Christo­pher’s of­fice has been in­un­dat­ed with lit­i­ga­tion over long out­stand­ing FUL ap­pli­ca­tions, most of which pre­date her tenure.

The lit­i­ga­tion came while the TTPS was do­ing a ma­jor au­dit in­to the is­su­ing of FULs.

While the re­sults of the au­dit were not made pub­lic, Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley re­vealed that sig­nif­i­cant anom­alies in the pro­ce­dure for is­su­ing FULs were un­earthed.

Many of the cas­es have been de­ter­mined, with Hare­wood-Christo­pher be­ing giv­en dead­lines for ren­der­ing de­ci­sions.

The busi­ness­man from Ch­agua­nas was rep­re­sent­ed by Tara­dath Singh, while Kent Sam­lal and Varun De­bideen rep­re­sent­ed the oth­er busi­ness­man and busi­ness­woman. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored