JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, April 3, 2025

US tariffs plus shipping fees equals catastrophe

by

Andrea Perez-Sobers
4 days ago
20250329

Over the past few weeks, US Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump has an­nounced a se­ries of tar­iffs on big economies, which has caused con­cern in this coun­try, and around the world, due to the trade agree­ments on goods and ve­hi­cles.

In­ter­na­tion­al me­dia last week re­port­ed that Trump ini­tial­ly said he was im­pos­ing a 25 per cent tar­iff on all cars com­ing in­to the coun­try.

The White House lat­er clar­i­fied that for­eign au­to parts would al­so be taxed at the 25 per cent rate even if the ve­hi­cles they go in­to are as­sem­bled in the US.

How­ev­er, com­pa­nies that im­port ve­hi­cles un­der the Unit­ed States-Mex­i­co-Cana­da Agree­ment (USM­CA) will get spe­cial con­sid­er­a­tion un­til the Com­merce De­part­ment es­tab­lish­es a process for levy­ing the 25 per cent du­ties, the White House said.

Asked about the glob­al tar­iff sce­nario at a post-Cab­i­net news con­fer­ence last Thurs­day, Prime Min­is­ter Stu­art Young said the bi­lat­er­al talks with Unit­ed States Sec­re­tary of State Mar­co Ru­bio last Wednes­day pre­sent­ed an op­por­tu­ni­ty to get the hear­ing to put for­ward T&T’s ar­gu­ment on how things can af­fect the Cari­com re­gion.

“There was a com­mit­ment to con­tin­ue com­mu­ni­cat­ing as life un­folds and that is the best com­mit­ment you can get. I al­so think we are on a much small­er scale. For ex­am­ple, on the ship­ping side, the US has dis­cre­tion as to how they ap­ply these things. So, on Wednes­day was a good day to hear our side,” Young out­lined.

As con­cerns loom, Trop­i­cal Ship­ping pres­i­dent and chief ex­ec­u­tive of­fi­cer Tim Mar­tin tes­ti­fied last Mon­day be­fore the of­fice of the US Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive, that the pro­posed tar­iffs in ad­di­tion to fees the US Gov­ern­ment is con­sid­er­ing im­pos­ing on Chi­nese-built ships would se­vere­ly af­fect Amer­i­can-owned ship­ping com­pa­nies as well as US ex­porters and Caribbean busi­ness­es.

In a news re­lease, Trop­i­cal Ship­ping said the pro­posed tar­iffs in­clude a flat US$1 mil­lion port fee on Chi­nese-built ves­sels en­ter­ing US ports. “The US ship­ping in­dus­try serv­ing the Caribbean can­not ab­sorb the ad­di­tion­al costs of the pro­posed port fees, which would have sig­nif­i­cant eco­nom­ic con­se­quences,” Mar­tin tes­ti­fied. “In­stead of strength­en­ing Amer­i­can com­pet­i­tive­ness, these port fees would push Amer­i­can-owned car­ri­ers like Trop­i­cal out of busi­ness.”

Trop­i­cal Ship­ping op­er­ates out of the Port of Palm Beach Flori­da, and nine of its 19 ves­sels were built in Chi­na up to 25 years ago. Mar­tin asked the US­TR to ex­empt Amer­i­can-owned and head­quar­tered ves­sel op­er­a­tors from pro­posed fees and to ap­ply the tar­iffs on fu­ture ships built in Chi­na, but not on ves­sels that are al­ready in ser­vice.

With re­spect to Trop­i­cal Ship­ping’s role in the Caribbean re­gion, Mar­tin said the av­er­age ves­sel serv­ing the re­gion car­ries 1,100 twen­ty foot-equiv­a­lent units (TEUs.)

“If the fees in the pro­posed ac­tion are ap­plied to these small­er ves­sels, we would have to dou­ble our freight rates, with an av­er­age in­crease of US$2,500 per con­tain­er. An in­crease of this mag­ni­tude would be cat­a­stroph­ic for Amer­i­can ex­porters and Caribbean con­sumers. As a com­par­i­son, ap­ply­ing the pro­posed US$1 mil­lion fee to a ves­sel that calls on a sin­gle US port di­rect­ly from Chi­na car­ry­ing 16,000 TEUs would in­crease the cost per 40-foot con­tain­er by on­ly US$125,” the pres­i­dent and CEO de­tailed.

US com­pa­nies hurt

Ear­li­er in the week Pres­i­dent Trump an­nounced a 25 per cent tar­iff across the board on any coun­try buy­ing oil or gas from Venezuela.

In a Truth So­cial post, Trump said Venezuela has been “very hos­tile” to the US., and coun­tries pur­chas­ing oil from it will be forced to pay the tar­iff on all their trade to the US start­ing April 2.

The tar­iffs would most like­ly add to the tax­es fac­ing Chi­na, which in 2023 bought 68 per cent of the oil ex­port­ed by Venezuela, ac­cord­ing to a 2024 analy­sis by the U.S. En­er­gy In­for­ma­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Spain, In­dia, Rus­sia, Sin­ga­pore, and Viet­nam are al­so among the coun­tries re­ceiv­ing oil from Venezuela, the re­port shows.

Speak­ing on the is­sue, for­mer en­er­gy min­is­ter Car­olyn Seep­er­sad-Bachan told Sun­day Busi­ness Guardian that this coun­try does not pur­chase oil and gas from Venezuela at this time.

“I think what is of con­cern is what is the im­pact go­ing for­ward on the Drag­on gas deal that we are talk­ing about and the Co­quina-Man­akin gas field. In that re­gard, we have to be mind­ful that it is gov­erned by an OFAC li­cence. Un­til that is re­voked, I don’t see that be­ing an is­sue, be­cause that li­cence as well, if we go back to the track and gas, for ex­am­ple, we are speak­ing about an ex­plo­ration and pro­duc­tion li­cense, a 30-year li­cence with the Venezue­lan gov­ern­ment for the de­vel­op­ment of that field, for the ex­trac­tion and de­vel­op­ment of that field,” Seep­er­sad-Bachan ex­plained.

She said a sim­i­lar sce­nario ap­plies to the Co­quina-Man­akin field as well and that would be more of a con­cern as this is an in­di­ca­tor as to what will be tak­ing place come Oc­to­ber, when the gov­ern­ment of the Unit­ed States would be re­quired to ei­ther the OFAC li­cence or al­low it to lapse..

“There was a re­port in in­ter­na­tion­al me­dia which said that Shell says there is an ex­pec­ta­tion that it would be pro­duc­ing nat­ur­al gas at Venezuela’s Drag­on gas field and ex­port­ing to T&T ear­li­er than the tar­get­ed pro­duc­tion date of 2027, prob­a­bly a whole year ear­li­er, 2026.”

Seep­er­sad-Bachan al­so not­ed that this coun­try should not have been in this po­si­tion where all of its eggs were in one bas­ket. She ques­tioned why this coun­try didn’t take ag­gres­sive steps to pur­sue the de­vel­op­ment of the deep­wa­ter acreage with­in T&T’s mar­itime bound­aries.

Al­so weigh­ing in on the mat­ter was en­er­gy ex­pert, An­tho­ny Paul, who said it is pro­posed that T&T and Shell would pro­duce nat­ur­al gas from the Drag­on fiels and sell it... in re­turn, T&T pays Venezuela a roy­al­ty.

“Venezuela isn’t sell­ing us gas. We are ex­tract­ing the gas, and we are sell­ing it, and we are pay­ing Venezuela for the right to ex­tract the gas. What does he mean by pay­ing Venezuela for gas and oil? Chi­na buys oil from Venezuela. So, Chi­na will pay for the oil. There’s a slight dif­fer­ence in the lan­guage and how it’s be­ing in­ter­pret­ed,” he out­lined.

Paul added that, due to geopol­i­tics, he can­not say for sure if the pro­posed tar­iffs on coun­tries that buy Venezue­lan gas would af­fect the Drag­on gas deal.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored