In theatre, KP Appan, the renowned critic, drew an interesting comparison between the hero of theatre and the hero of cinema and between the directors of theatre and cinema. He opined that the hero of theatre is the make-or-break factor of a play, since their live performance and decisions dictate the experience for the audience. In cinema, the director is the force behind the success of a film, shaping the story, visuals, and overall experience behind the camera.
Drawing inspiration from this comparison, I observe remarkable similarities in the sporting world, with the cricket captain being the hero of theatre and the football coach being the cinema director. Let us find out why.
Like the theatre hero, the cricket captain is the center of attention whose choices and command determine the match. On the field, the captain makes decisions in the moment—field placement, bowler choice, and declaring an innings. These are momentary decisions but vital ones, like a theatre hero reacting to the timing of a live play.
Instances of MS Dhoni’s cautious choice to promote himself in the India batting order in the 2011 World Cup final or Eoin Morgan’s aggressive leadership in England’s 2019 triumph demonstrate how a captain’s decisions can turn a game around. The cricket captain faces immense pressure, with millions of spectators reviewing every move. Like a theatre hero, however, they deliver under pressure, creating performances that inspire their team and thrill the audience.
In contrast, the football captain’s role during a match is not as impactful as the cricket captain’s, much like the hero in cinema, who, while important, is not the sole deciding factor of a film’s success. In football, the captain’s primary role is to motivate the team and communicate with the referee. Still, the tactical decisions are largely pre-determined by the coach. Unlike the cricket captain, who constantly adjusts strategies based on the game’s flow, the football captain has limited influence over the match’s outcome once the whistle blows. For example, while a football captain like Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo can inspire their team with their performance, the coach controls the overall strategy and substitutions.
This makes the football captain more akin to a supporting actor in cinema, whose role, while significant, is shaped by the director’s vision. Conversely, the football coach is the film director, the team’s strategy and success mastermind. Like a film director, the coach orchestrates the story during practice sessions, determining formations, tactics, and player positions. Their vision determines the team’s identity, similar to a director determining a film’s story and visuals.
Pep Guardiola’s revolutionary tactics at Manchester City and Mikel Arteta’s high-pressing approach at Arsenal are the best examples of how a coach’s strategic brilliance can make a team play better. While the coach’s impact during a match is restricted to substitutions and halftime speeches, their preparation is essential, similar to a director’s efforts during film production. The football coach also experiences tremendous pressure, with fans and management expecting results. However, similar to film directors, their ability to adapt and motivate guarantees the team’s success.
Similarly, the cricket coach on the field is less authoritative than the football coach, just like the director of drama, whose authority ends at the beginning of the performance. The role of the cricket coach is to prepare the team and prepare strategies before the match. While the game is being played, the captain can make in-game decisions that guide the game. Whereas the cricket coach provides valuable advice between games, his authority is less than that of the football coach, who can implement changes in strategy on the playing field. This places the cricket coach on a level with the drama director, who prepares the stage but leaves the game to the performers.
Some similarities are apparent when comparing the cricket captain and the football coach. Both the cricket captain and the football coach must work under immense pressure, with their decisions and strategies directly impacting the game. The cricket captain’s role is, however, more overt and direct, akin to that of the hero in drama. In contrast, the football coach’s role is more covert and behind-the-scenes, akin to that of the director in film. The cricket captain likes real-time decision-making and leadership. In contrast, the football coach likes strategic planning and long-term vision.
So why must we look up to the cricket captain like the theatre hero and the football coach like the cinema director? The on-field performance of the cricket captain and the ability to make crucial, game-changing decisions under pressure makes them the actual game hero. His leadership motivates his team and the crowd as much as the on-stage performance of a theatre hero. On the other hand, the football coach’s brilliance off the field and game planning are the things that drive a team to success. His ability to create a winning performance, as much as a cinema director, must be equally looked up to.
In short, just as KP Appan brought to the fore the distinctive yet equally important roles of the hero on stage and the director on screen, we can observe how the cricket captain and football coach play these roles in their respective sports. Whether the heroism of the cricket captain on the field or the masterminds of the football coach off the field, both of them are as vital to the success of their respective teams. Let us hail these sports’ behind-the-scenes heroes, whose stories are worth hearing and remembering. After all, in the grand play of sports, every player—be it the cricket captain, the football coach, or even the football captain and cricket coach—is part of the magic we all love.
Ajith Gopi, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in Physical Education at Don Bosco College, Panjim- Goa, India. Email: ajithgopi@donboscogoa.ac.in