JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, March 30, 2025

World hurtling to climate danger zone, brakes half-pulled

by

1090 days ago
20220404
File - Large Icebergs float away as the sun rises near Kulusuk, Greenland, Aug. 16, 2019. A United Nation-backed panel plans to release a highly anticipated scientific report on Monday, April 4, 2022, on international efforts to curb climate change before global temperatures reach dangerous levels. (AP Photo/Felipe Dana, File)

File - Large Icebergs float away as the sun rises near Kulusuk, Greenland, Aug. 16, 2019. A United Nation-backed panel plans to release a highly anticipated scientific report on Monday, April 4, 2022, on international efforts to curb climate change before global temperatures reach dangerous levels. (AP Photo/Felipe Dana, File)

By FRANK JOR­DANS and SETH BOREN­STEIN | AS­SO­CI­AT­ED PRESS

 

BERLIN (AP) — Tem­per­a­tures on Earth will shoot past a key dan­ger point un­less green­house gas emis­sions fall faster than coun­tries have com­mit­ted, the world’s top body of cli­mate sci­en­tists said Mon­day, warn­ing of the con­se­quences of in­ac­tion but al­so not­ing hope­ful signs of progress.

U.N. Sec­re­tary-Gen­er­al An­to­nio Guter­res said the re­port by the In­ter­gov­ern­men­tal Pan­el on Cli­mate Change re­vealed “a litany of bro­ken cli­mate promis­es” by gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions, ac­cus­ing them of stok­ing glob­al warm­ing by cling­ing to harm­ful fos­sil fu­els.

“It is a file of shame, cat­a­logu­ing the emp­ty pledges that put us firm­ly on track to­wards an un­liv­able world,” he said.

Gov­ern­ments agreed in the 2015 Paris ac­cord to keep glob­al warm­ing well be­low 2 de­grees Cel­sius (3.6 Fahren­heit) this cen­tu­ry, ide­al­ly no more than 1.5 de­grees Cel­sius (2.7 Fahren­heit). Yet tem­per­a­tures have al­ready in­creased by over 1.1C (2F) since pre-in­dus­tri­al times, re­sult­ing in mea­sur­able in­creas­es in dis­as­ters such flash floods, pro­longed droughts, more in­tense hur­ri­canes and longer-burn­ing wild­fires, putting hu­man lives in dan­ger and cost­ing gov­ern­ments hun­dreds of bil­lions of dol­lars to con­front.

“Pro­ject­ed glob­al emis­sions from (na­tion­al pledges) place lim­it­ing glob­al warm­ing to 1.5C be­yond reach and make it hard­er af­ter 2030 to lim­it warm­ing to 2C,” the pan­el said.

In oth­er words, the re­port’s co-chair, James Skea of Im­pe­r­i­al Col­lege Lon­don, told The As­so­ci­at­ed Press: “If we con­tin­ue act­ing as we are now, we’re not even go­ing to lim­it warm­ing to 2 de­grees, nev­er mind 1.5 de­grees.”

On­go­ing in­vest­ments in fos­sil fu­el in­fra­struc­ture and clear­ing large swaths of for­est for agri­cul­ture un­der­mine the mas­sive curbs in emis­sions need­ed to meet the Paris goal, the re­port found.

“To keep the 1.5-de­gree lim­it agreed in Paris with­in reach, we need to cut glob­al emis­sions by 45% this decade,” said Guter­res, the U.N. chief. “But cur­rent cli­mate pledges would mean a 14% in­crease in emis­sions.”

In a sum­ma­ry ne­go­ti­at­ed with gov­ern­ments over the past two weeks, the pan­el con­clud­ed that re­turn­ing warm­ing to 1.5C by 2100 would re­quire re­mov­ing vast amounts of car­bon diox­ide — the main green­house gas — from the at­mos­phere. Many ex­perts say this is un­fea­si­ble with cur­rent tech­nolo­gies, and even if it could be done it would be far cost­lier than pre­vent­ing the emis­sions in the first place.

The re­port’s au­thors said they had “high con­fi­dence” that un­less coun­tries step up their ef­forts to cut green­house gas emis­sions, the plan­et will on av­er­age be 2.4C to 3.5C (4.3 to 6.3 F) warmer by the end of the cen­tu­ry — a lev­el ex­perts say is sure to cause se­vere im­pacts for much of the world’s pop­u­la­tion.

“We are on a path­way to glob­al warm­ing of more than dou­ble the 1.5-de­gree lim­it agreed in Paris,” said Guter­res. “Some gov­ern­ment and busi­ness lead­ers are say­ing one thing – but do­ing an­oth­er.”

“Sim­ply put, they are ly­ing,” he added. “And the re­sults will be cat­a­stroph­ic.”

De­spite the tough words by Guter­res and re­port co-chairs, the full re­port, num­ber­ing thou­sands of pages con­densed in­to a sum­ma­ry by gov­ern­ments and sci­en­tists, doesn’t sin­gle out in­di­vid­ual coun­tries for blame.

How­ev­er, the fig­ures show much of the car­bon diox­ide al­ready in the at­mos­phere was re­leased by rich coun­tries that were the first to burn coal, oil and gas when the in­dus­tri­al rev­o­lu­tion re­al­ly got go­ing in the 1850s.

The U.N. pan­el said about 40% of emis­sions since then came from Eu­rope and North Amer­i­ca. Just over 12% can be at­trib­uted to East Asia, which in­cludes Chi­na. The coun­try took over the po­si­tion as world’s top emit­ter from the Unit­ed States in the mid-2000s.

The re­port isn’t with­out some hope, how­ev­er.

Its au­thors high­light myr­i­ad ways in which the world can be brought back on track to 2C or even, with great ef­fort, re­turn to 1.5C af­ter that thresh­old has been passed. This could re­quire mea­sures such as the re­moval of CO2 from the at­mos­phere with nat­ur­al or ar­ti­fi­cial means, but al­so po­ten­tial­ly risky tech­nolo­gies such as pump­ing aerosols in­to the sky to re­flect sun­light.

Among the so­lu­tions rec­om­mend­ed are a rapid shift away from fos­sil fu­els to­ward re­new­able en­er­gy such as so­lar and wind, the elec­tri­fi­ca­tion of trans­port, more ef­fi­cient use of re­sources and mas­sive fi­nan­cial sup­port for poor coun­tries un­able to pay for such mea­sures with­out help.

One move of­ten de­scribed as “low-hang­ing fruit” by sci­en­tists is to plug methane leaks from mines, wells and land­fills that re­lease the po­tent but short-lived green­house gas in­to the at­mos­phere. A pact forged be­tween the Unit­ed States and Chi­na at last year’s U.N. cli­mate con­fer­ence in Glas­gow aims to do just that.

“You can see the first signs that the ac­tions that peo­ple are tak­ing are be­gin­ning to make a dif­fer­ence,” said Skea, the pan­el’s co-chair.

“The big mes­sage we’ve got (is that) hu­man ac­tiv­i­ties got us in­to this prob­lem and hu­man agency can ac­tu­al­ly get us out of it again,” he said.

The pan­el’s re­ports have be­come in­creas­ing­ly blunt since the first one was pub­lished in 1990, and the lat­est may be the last be­fore the plan­et pass­es 1.5C of warm­ing, Skea told the AP.

Last Au­gust, it said cli­mate change caused by hu­mans was “an es­tab­lished fact” and warned that some ef­fects of glob­al warm­ing are al­ready in­evitable. In late Feb­ru­ary, the pan­el pub­lished a re­port that out­lined how fur­ther tem­per­a­ture in­creas­es will mul­ti­ply the risk of floods, storms, drought and heat waves world­wide.

Still, the British gov­ern­ment’s for­mer chief sci­ence ad­vis­er David King, who wasn’t in­volved in writ­ing the re­port, said there are op­ti­mistic as­sump­tions about how much CO2 the world can af­ford to emit.

The U.N. pan­el sug­gests there’s still a “car­bon bud­get” of 500 bil­lion met­ric tons (550 bil­lion U.S. tons) that can be emit­ted be­fore hit­ting the 1.5C thresh­old.

“We don’t ac­tu­al­ly have a re­main­ing car­bon bud­get to burn,” said King, who now chairs the Cli­mate Cri­sis Ad­vi­so­ry Group.

“It’s just the re­verse. We’ve al­ready done too much in the way of putting green­house gas­es up there,” he said, ar­gu­ing that the IPCC’s cal­cu­la­tion omits new risks and po­ten­tial­ly self-re­in­forc­ing ef­fects al­ready hap­pen­ing in some places, such as the in­creased ab­sorp­tion of heat in­to the oceans from sea ice loss and the re­lease of methane as per­mafrost melts, he said.

Such warn­ings were echoed by U.N. chief Guter­res, cit­ing sci­en­tists’ warn­ings that the plan­et is mov­ing “per­ilous­ly close to tip­ping points that could lead to cas­cad­ing and ir­re­versible cli­mate im­pacts.”

“But high-emit­ting gov­ern­ments and cor­po­ra­tions are not just turn­ing a blind eye; they are adding fu­el to the flames,” he said, call­ing for an end to fur­ther coal, oil and gas ex­trac­tion that the re­port said might have to be aban­doned any­way, re­sult­ing in loss­es of tril­lions of dol­lars.

“In­vest­ing in new fos­sil fu­els in­fra­struc­ture is moral and eco­nom­ic mad­ness,” said Guter­res.

Vul­ner­a­ble na­tions said the re­port showed big pol­luters have to step up their ef­forts.

“We are look­ing to the G-20, to the world’s biggest emit­ters, to set am­bi­tious tar­gets ahead of COP27, and to reach those tar­gets – by in­vest­ing in re­new­ables, cut­ting out coal and fos­sil fu­el sub­si­dies,” said Tina Stege, cli­mate en­voy for the Mar­shall Is­lands. “It’s long past time to de­liv­er on promis­es made.”

___

Seth Boren­stein re­port­ed from Wash­ing­ton.

EnvironmentUnited Nations


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored