Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s announcement that the Government intends to divest several state-owned enterprises, including the Hilton Trinidad, Magdalena Grand Beach and Golf Resort, National Quarries Limited and the La Brea Industrial Development Company Limited (LABIDCO), is a welcome signal that the State is reconsidering its role in commercial activity.
Trinidad and Tobago can no longer afford to tie up scarce public resources in enterprises that private operators may be better equipped to manage. Money used to sustain underperforming businesses is unavailable for healthcare, education, infrastructure and other investments that can strengthen the productive economy.
Private operators can bring fresh financing, specialised expertise and stronger incentives to improve productivity, expand markets and create jobs. Successful divestment could also reduce the risk of taxpayer-funded bailouts and allow the Government to concentrate on its core responsibilities.
But private ownership does not automatically guarantee better results.
Selling a public asset generates one-off revenue; it does not, by itself, create sustainable growth. Poorly negotiated transactions could deprive the country of future income or surrender valuable assets below their true worth. The objective must therefore be not simply a sale, but demonstrable long-term economic benefit.
Divestment should form part of a coherent economic strategy, including a comprehensive evaluation of State assets, whether profitable, loss-making or considered to be strategic.
In tourism, new investment in the Hilton and Magdalena properties could improve accommodation, service standards and marketing, helping to attract visitors, generate foreign exchange and support businesses across the tourism value chain.
The case is particularly important for Tobago, where improved air access through the ANR Robinson International Airport must be matched by adequate accommodation and tourism services. The Magdalena should contribute meaningfully to that effort rather than remain a burden on taxpayers.
Similarly, a more efficiently operated National Quarries could support construction and infrastructure development through reliable aggregate supplies and improved productivity, while LABIDCO could attract investment that expands industrial activity and employment.
However, each transaction must be judged by its contribution to the productive economy, not simply the sale price.
Crucially, divestment must not become an avenue for political patronage or the transfer of public assets to favoured interests at bargain prices. Government must ensure that its programme does not provide opportunities for a privileged few to acquire public wealth on favourable terms.
Independent valuations, open competitive tendering, published selection criteria and rigorous oversight must therefore be non-negotiable. Successful bidders should be selected on merit, financial capacity and credible development plans, with measurable investment commitments that can be enforced.
The Government must not mistake the disposal of assets for economic reform. Without transparency, proper valuation and enforceable commitments, divestment risks replacing state-sector inefficiency with private-sector privilege.
Ultimately, every sale must deliver tangible benefits for T&T. Anything less would leave taxpayers carrying the cost while others reap the rewards.
