Congratulations are in order for this year’s outstanding Secondary Entrance Assessment (SEA) performers. Adam Ng Tang and David Ramlakhan (Montrose Government), Katherine Adjodha (St Peter’s Private), Amara Battan (Curepe Presbyterian), Shivan Khan (Caroni Hindu), Shazana Mohammed (Debe Hindu), Liam Rajnauth (Trinidad Renaissance Preparatory), Ethan Ramlackhansingh (San Fernando TML) and Vivek Supersad-Maharaj (Munroe Road Hindu were in the top nine named by the Ministry of Education.
Their achievement reflects years of dedication, the support of parents and teachers and countless hours of hard work. They deserve every accolade. The Ministry of Education also recognised the top 200 performers, highlighting excellence across schools nationwide. Their success is a reminder that Trinidad and Tobago continues to produce bright, capable young people with enormous potential.
Yet, while the nation celebrates these accomplishments, it should not ignore the uncomfortable questions raised by UNESCO’s latest Global Education Monitoring Report. If anything, this year’s SEA results should serve as another opportunity to ask whether the examination continues to fulfil the purpose for which it was created.
UNESCO’s assessment is difficult to dismiss. It acknowledges that Trinidad and Tobago has made remarkable progress by achieving universal secondary education and expanding access through the construction of new schools. Every child today has the opportunity to attend secondary school, an achievement that generations before could only have imagined.
But access alone is not equity.
The report argues that our education system continues to determine children’s futures far too early, reinforcing social and economic inequalities instead of reducing them. That criticism goes to the heart of the SEA debate.
The examination was introduced when secondary school places were scarce. Its precursors, the College Exhibition and Common Entrance examinations, existed because there simply were not enough spaces to accommodate every child leaving primary school. SEA functioned as a gatekeeper to limited opportunities.
That rationale has disappeared.
Today, every child is guaranteed a place at secondary school. Yet, SEA continues to divide schools into perceived winners and losers, creating a hierarchy that shapes parental choices, student confidence and public perception. Prestigious schools continue to attract the highest-performing students, while many others struggle against reputations that become increasingly difficult to overcome.
UNESCO also highlights another uncomfortable reality: family income remains one of the strongest predictors of educational success. Parents with greater financial means can afford private lessons, educational resources and enrichment opportunities that give their children a significant advantage. Those from poorer households often begin the race several steps behind.
The emotional cost cannot be overlooked either. For many 11 and 12-year-olds, SEA has become a source of extraordinary anxiety. Educators and mental health professionals have repeatedly warned about the psychological strain placed on children who are made to believe that one examination will determine the course of their lives.
None of this diminishes the achievements of this year’s top performers. Excellence should always be recognised and encouraged.
But the nation’s real challenge extends beyond celebrating those who excelled. The goal should be ensuring that every secondary school offers the same quality of teaching, opportunities and support, so that a child’s future is not determined by a single examination or the name of the school on a placement slip.
Our top SEA students have passed their examination with distinction. The larger question is whether T&T’s education system can now pass the test that UNESCO has set before it.
